IF GROUP PROBLEM-SOLVING IS LESS PRODUCTIVE THAN THAT OF INDIVIDUALS, HOW CAN ONE GET THE BEST OF BOTH (INDIVIDUAL & GROUP) WORLDS COMBINING BREADTH & DEPTH OF IDEAS?
I have found that generating large
numbers of ideas doesn't imply a larger number of potential nuggets. The
free-association aspect of traditional brainstorming is often more useful as a
means of mapping the preoccupations and thinking-styles of a group than in
generating useful ideas.
THE DANGER OF THE FIRST IDEA
Another difficulty is that the first
idea voiced in traditional brainstorming, may prove to be the last. I have
noticed that extended stress-gaps in teams, combined with a high need to
produce an output, can lead to the generation of ideas long before the team has
agreed and formally defined the problem. Such teams are easily led astray by
the first idea. It is as though the first idea dominates or "shapes"
everything that follows to develop an inadvertent “groupthink”.
The need to work on something, often
anything, can mean that the first idea voiced, slants or influences the
expectations of the group and can misdirect all the ideas that follow. The team
embellishes the initial idea, producing variations and investing in this
direction until, much too late, it realises that this area is rather
unproductive but feels unwilling to abandon work that has involved so much
emotion, time and effort.
IDEA-VETTING
Ideas can be vetted
inadvertently. I have seen facilitators
scribbling ideas down onto flipcharts as the team shouted them out in
traditional brainstorming style and noticed their unconscious vetting of ideas
that they disliked by not writing them down.
When asked subsequently why they missed these ideas and ultimately
switched those individuals off from any further positive contributions, they simply
said that they had not heard the ideas.
When revisited on video, the excluded
ideas sounded just as loud as the other "acceptable" ideas.
CREATIVE SILENCE
The solution to overcome this type of
"groupthink" is to introduce a new discipline to traditional
brainstorming, by asking individuals to "kick-off" the process of
generating solutions or ideas by doing it individually,
and in silence and recording their ideas on Post-Its.
This "Creative Silence"
approach leads to a significant improvement in quality and diversity of ideas.
The resulting ideas are collected by asking individuals to contribute their
ideas in threes, and without comment, working round the team until all the
ideas are represented. This also encourages individuals to listen to each
others' ideas to avoid presenting the same idea again.I find Post-Its for individuals a very useful way of accelerating this process. I have no investments in the manufacturers, nor do I (as yet) receive a retainer for making this suggestion! Remember: One idea per Post-It, write all ideas with the same colour flipchart-pen, to disguise the ownership of ideas and reduce status-awareness.
A minor point to remember is that ideas may need to be expressed in more than just a single word on a Post-It in order to mean something to other team-members.
Creative Silence Brainstorming - 5
Basic Rules
1 Two Minutes Creative Silence (at
least)
2 One idea per Post-It
3 Same colour pen
4 Share 3 ideas at a time, going
round the group
5 Remove duplicates, build on
triggers, seek combination and improvement
If used correctly, this tool will help you and your team to effectively generate useful solution in a relatively short period of time. Its success however, depends upon your process discipline!
No comments:
Post a Comment