One of the weird things about innovation is the way practitioners
find themselves focusing on what appear to be the essential components of innovation,
in other words: innovation processes and stage gate decision making meetings. Ironically,
they are worrying about the furniture of innovation and not the innovation behaviours
that make it possible. It’s another example of how managers tend to work on
doing things right even when they are focusing on the wrong things, instead of
doing the right thing.
Understanding innovation leadership is a bit like driving a
car. At present, most organisations manage their psychology of innovation like
drivers of cars who happen to be blind. It is possible to become relatively
successful at leading an organisation through the medium of traditional
performance measures. These are much like the cues that a blind driver uses to
stay in the correct lane on the motorway.
By listening to the sound cues of irregular bumping of tyres over cat’s
eyes on one side of the car, and the screeching noise of the other side of the
car grinding along the side of the oncoming traffic or stationary vehicles or
building, a crude form of progress can be managed; even if getting onto and off
the motorway is problemmatic. Every
year, there are stories of blind drivers in remote rural areas (usually with a drunk
giving instructions from the back seat) being chased and halted by astounded
traffic police. It clearly can be done, and
is being done, more or less: but does it make sense? And is it acceptable?
Not being in control of your own innovation leadership behaviour
as a leader, is like leading your team
or organization as though it is a car that you choose to drive with your eyes closed. Most people have no idea what their
innovation leadership profile is. They are in effect, blind leaders of innovation.
We are probably all familiar with the idea that it is not what leaders say, but
how leaders actually behave that has the most impact on organisations, and that
it is their behaviour that sends the strongest messages and provides the most
powerful cues as to what defines successful performance in the organisation.